Funding Science with Science: Cryptocurrency and Independent Academic Research Funding

Edward Lehner, Dylan Hunzeker, John R. Ziegler


Scientific funding within the academy is an often complicated affair involving disparate and competing interests. Private universities, for instance, are vastly outpacing public institutions in garnering large, prestigious, science-related grants and external research investment. Inequities also extend to the types of research funded, with government, corporate, and even military interests privileging certain types of inquiry. This article proposes an innovative type of science research fund using cryptocurrencies, a fast-growing asset class. Although not a total funding solution, staking coins, specifically, can be strategically invested in to yield compound interest. These coins use masternode technologies to collateralize the network and speed transaction pace and may pay dividends to masternode holders, allowing institutions that purchase these types of central hubs to potentially engage in a lucrative form of dividend reinvestment. Using cryptocurrencies as a new funding stream may garner large amounts of capital and creation of nonprofit institutes to support the future of funding scientific research within educational institutions.


funding basic science; masternodes; scientific funding; staking coins.

Full Text:



Ali, M. M., Bhattacharyya, P., Olejniczak, A. J. “The Effects of Scholarly Productivity and Institutional Characteristics on the Distribution of Federal Research Grants.” The Journal of Higher Education 81.2 164-165, 175 (2010)

Burniske, C., White, A. “Bitcoin: Ringing the Bell for a New Asset Class.” Ark Invest (January 2017)

Chamber, K. “What the Big Names are Doing: Influences of Endowments & Foundations in the Investment Philosophy.” Headwater Investment Consulting (April 2015),Endowments.pdf

Chomsky, N. “Noam Chomsky—Startup Culture.” YouTube (27 October 2015)

Chomsky N. “Public Education Under Massive Corporate Assault—What’s Next?” AlterNet (August 5, 2011)

Christensen, C. M. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Brighton: Harvard Business Review Press 3-35 (2013)

Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. “Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research.” In N. K. Denszin, Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 11-14 (2017)

Giroux, H. A. “Neoliberalism’s War Against Higher Education and the Role of Public Intellectuals.” In M. Izak, M. Kostera, M. Zawadzki (Ed.) The Future of University Education, New York: Palgrave (2017) 185-206

Giroux, H. A. University in Chains: Confronting the Military-Industrial-Academic Complex. Abingdon, U.K.: Routledge 52-53 (2015)

Greenwood, D. J., Levin, M. “Reform of the Social Sciences and of UniversitiesThrough Action Research.” In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 43-64 (2005)

Greer, R. J. “What is an Asset Class, Anyway?” The Journal of Portfolio Management 23.2 (1997) 86-91

Haller, S. F., Gerrie, J. “The Role of Science in Public Policy: Higher Reason, or Reason for Hire?” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20.2 139-165 (2007)

Ioannidis, J. P. “Defending Biomedical Science in an Era of Threatened Funding.” JAMA 317.24 2483-2484 (2017)

Kennedy, J. V. “The Sources and Uses of US Science Funding.” The New Atlantis 36 (2012)

Kincheloe, J. L., McLaren, P., Steinberg, S. R., Monzó, L. D. “Critical Pedagogy and Qualitative Research: Advancing the Bricolage.” In N.

K. Denszin, Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.) Thousand Oaks: Sage 235-260 (2017)

Lehner, E. “Describing Students of the African Diaspora: Understanding Micro and Meso Level Science Learning as Gateways to Standards Based Discourse.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 2.2 449 (2007)

Lehner, E. “The Return of the Natural Philosopher.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 5.1 71-78 (2010)

Lehner, E., Finley, K. “Should the New England Education Research Organization Start a Journal in the Age of Audit Culture? Reflections on Academic Publishing, Metrics, and the New Academy.” Bronx Community College (1 August 2016)

Levi-Strauss, C. The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson 16-22 (1966)

Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G. “Ethics: The Failure of Positivist Science.” The Review of Higher Education 12.3 227-228 (1989)

Malkiel, B. G. A Random Walk Down Wall Street. New York: WW Norton & Company 15-45 (1974)

McKinley, D. C., et al. “Citizen Science Can Improve Conservation Science, Natural Resource Management, and Environmental Protection.” Biological Conservation 208 15-28 (2017)

Mervis, J. “From the Outside Looking In.” Science 329.5989 270-273 (2010)

Mortenson, T. “State funding: A race to the bottom.” American Council on Education (Winter 2012)

Nestle, M. Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. Berkeley: University of California Press 2 (2013)

No Author. “Our Model.” Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy (accessed 18 August 2017)

Piccirillo, J. F., Yueh, B., Davies, L., Weaver, E. “Addressing the Challenges for Otolaryngology Research to Inform Patient Care and Outcomes.” JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery 143.9 865-868 (2017)

Reif, L. R. “How to Maintain America’s Edge: Increase Funding for Basic Science.” Foreign Affairs 96 95 (May/June 2017)

Reiss, D. “What You Should Know About Dividend Reinvestment Plans.” U.S. News & World Report (12 January 2017)

Roth, W. M., Barton, A. C. Rethinking Scientific Literacy. Abingdon-on-Thames, U.K.: Psychology Press 2-3 (2004)

Shore, C. “Beyond the Multiversity: Neoliberalism and the Rise of the Schizophrenic University.” Social Anthropology 18.1 16-17 (2010)

Sismondo, S. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons 10-11(2011)

Strathern, M. “The Tyranny of Transparency.” British Educational Research Journal 26.3 309-321 (2000)

Tobin, K. “The Value to Science Education of Teachers Researching Their Own Praxis.” Research in Science Education 29.2 167 (1999)

Tobin, K. G. “Sociocultural Perspectives on Science Education.” In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, C. J. McRobbie (Ed.) Second International Handbook of Science Education. New York: Springer 4-7 (2012)



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Edward Lehner, Dylan Hunzeker, John R. Ziegler

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.